Sunday

Bar Prep Course Twitter Chat

Hey, everyone!

Just a quick note to let you know I'll be participating in a Twitter chat organized by the folks over at the Bar Exam Toolbox on August 29, 2012 at 5pm PST/8pm EST.  I'll be using my @BarExamMind handle.

The topic of the chat will be how to select the right bar exam prep course to meet your needs and help you pass the bar exam.

To follow the chat, just search twitter.com for hashtag #barexamtools.  Feel free to ask any questions you might have during the chat.

If you can't make the chat (or you are reading this after August 29th), check out these posts:
  1. Selecting a bar prep course
  2. Review of AdaptiBar (and $50 off AdaptiBar!)
  3. Studying for the bar exam on a budget
Hope to see you there!

UPDATE:  Here is a transcript of the chat if you'd like to read through it:

Thursday

California First Year Law Student Exam

I came across an interesting case about the FYLSX when I was researching competitive bidding requirements for public entities. (I have no idea either....)

In any event, the case is Bib'le v. Committee of Bar Examiners, 162 Cal.Rptr. 426, 26 Cal.3d 548, 606 P.2d 733 (Cal., 1980) and involves a challenge by a student at an unaccredited law school who wanted to be able to sit for the general California bar exam without having to pass the FYLSX.

The case itself is an interesting read, but the court also summarized the rationale for creating the FYLSX in a footnote.  What I find interesting about the footnote was the court's statement that even in the 1930s, law schools were trying to get as many students as possible so they could earn money and were not looking out for the best interests of their students. Sound familiar?

Here is footnote 6 from the opinion:
The FYLSX is the end result of a 1933 Report of President's Advisory Committee submitted to the Board of Governors of the State Bar. The report recited pressures in some law schools to secure and maintain enrollment of students not qualified to become members of the bar. It was further reported that because unqualified students were not eliminated in many unaccredited law schools, it was not until such students had failed the bar examination after years of study that they realized they would never qualify for admission to the bar. Beginning in 1935 the committee required all first year students to take an examination in first year courses, except for those students receiving first year course instruction in schools approved by the committee.
[photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/49889874@N05/5580127313/]

Monday

Inspiration from Steve Jobs

Saturday

It Can Be Done!

 
Copyright 2009-Present Eclectic Esquire Media, LLC. Powered by Blogger
Disclaimer/Terms of Service
Blogger Templates create by Deluxe Templates. WP by Masterplan